Steroids in the Fields Not Just on Them
Usually our society is all about performance enhancing. If “the clear” or “the cream” increased bushels of corn per acre rather than Barry Bonds’ home runs BALCO would still be in business. Ball players are not supposed to take human growth hormones, but it’s ok to give our cows bovine growth hormones? From corked bats to greased balls baseball has a long history of doing whatever to get an edge. Football players bulk up to hundreds of pounds without anyone questioning what the long term effects of that size will have on their health. Certainly the new swimsuits and pool design influenced the record number of new world records set in the Beijing Olympics. No one seems to be advocating that everyone should ride the same bike for the Tour de France. So it can’t be just about level playing fields, or not using whatever technological improvement is out there. In some convoluted way the issue of health must be a part of it.
My objection to steroid use is rooted in health. I don’t think the short term benefit in performance justifies the long term health damages. It’s the same reason I’m opposed to chemical agriculture. Although my concern in our food system is not just with the health of the plants, or even just those who eat them, I care about the health of the whole planet.
Saint Louis isn’t just the home of Mark Maguire’s Cardinals; it’s also the home of Monsanto, one of the largest agricultural chemical and genetically modified seed companies in the world. We don’t know for certain that Maguire used steroids, and we don’t know for certain all of the ramifications of gmo seed. With individual people I’m a big advocate of innocent until proven guilty (I try to follow that in my personal relationships besides wanting it to be a cornerstone of our justice system.) When the outcome is of more than just some sporting event, but instead the well being of every plant and animal on the planet, I’d employ the precautionary principle--if an action or policy might cause severe or irreversible harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of a scientific consensus that harm would not ensue, the burden of proof falls on those who would advocate taking the action.
There is scientific evidence that Monsanto’s Round Up causes abnormalities in the reproductive organs of amphibians, increased rates of miscarriage in agriculture communities where it is widely sprayed, and yet I rarely spend a day in Sonoma County where I don’t see the tell-tale sign of yellowing dying vegetation from it having been sprayed. While Round Up Ready gmo seed is the largest segment of the gmo market.
As the highest paid athlete in baseball, A-Rod makes millions and his taking steroids might encourage youngsters to put their own health at risk, and that is a shame. But it pales in comparison to the milk board which has paid hundreds of celebrities to wear milk mustaches and promote milk from cows raised on bovine grown hormone. It pales in comparison to the billions made on chemical agriculture that is destroying the bios. And it pales in comparison to a culture that always seems to advocate for more home runs or more bushels of corn without at least stopping to think about the long term health consequences for everyone. What I’d tell Alex is what I’d tell society and large multinational corporations: Just because you can do something (and perhaps never get found out), doesn’t mean you should do it. I’ve found it takes more strength to control my urges than it does to just swing for the fences.